Section » Theory

Teachers have a right to unionize

Posted on February 15, 2011

The recipe is as follows: use “research” and phony evaluation systems to create a wedge between teachers and the public. Then, legally dismantle...

3 CommentsRead more »

Race to the Top Assessment Program: Part II – The Political Significance of Assessment Governance

Posted on May 11, 2010

RTTT is the "Carrot That Feels Like a Stick," says Mike Petrilli (of all people). He "can’t help but feel remorse for the death of federalism." As I prepare for a talk at DePaul University tomorrow, I’m...

1 CommentRead more »

Is Thinking a “Skill”? Values and Problems in Thinking About the “Liberal Arts”

Posted on March 2, 2010

In today’s online version of the Chronicle of Higher Education, four views regarding the “future of the liberal arts” are presented. While not intending to pick on Martha Nussbaum’s “The Liberal Arts Are Not Elitist” — for in spirit we share a common concern — the piece does nonetheless represent...

No CommentsRead more »

Are Tests Measures of Test Taking Ability?

Posted on February 22, 2010

In a recent discussion of my book, A Measure of Failure, the typical argument against any critique of standardized testing was issued in response to a favorable review of the book’s main points. In the comments we read: “A math test, such as the math...

No CommentsRead more »

The Questions of Education Reform Are Really Questions of Who Decides

Posted on December 4, 2009

It is clear that the education “reform” is being driven by a tiny minority of super wealthy “philanthropists”, executive authorities at state and federal levels of government, and some select “experts”. These are the same forces that have been “leading” education “reform” for the past 30 years, with the result that little has improved,...

2 CommentsRead more »

“National Standards” and the Public Good

Posted on November 17, 2009

In recent reports about the movement for “common standards for core curriculums in mathematics and reading” concern has been raised with respect to the political nature of the “common standards” agenda. Do these standards constitute “national standards”? To this question, organizers of the initiative say, “No. This initiative is driven...

No CommentsRead more »

Federal vs. National Standards

Posted on September 21, 2009

In recent reports about the movement for “common standards for core curriculums in mathematics and reading” spearheaded by various monopolies, state governors, and the U.S Department of Education, an important distinction has been raised. In today’s edition of Inside Higher Ed, Doug Lederman writes: Today...

No CommentsRead more »

On the Public/Private Distinction and Political Power

Posted on May 28, 2009

As privatization looms, conceptual clarity regarding this trend is required. Primary, secondary and higher education institutions all face changes that can be dubbed privatization. Yet recent reports point to the complexity of this trend. One example involves efforts of teachers to unionize at an...

No CommentsRead more »

ARRA Education Funds and the Crisis of Legitimacy

Posted on April 16, 2009

Governing by Carrots and Sticks: Excerpts from U.S. Secretary of Education, Arne Duncan “If folks are playing shell games, if folks are operating in bad faith, it puts their second chance at billions of dollars in jeopardy,” he said. “We have significant carrots and sticks.” — Arne Duncan, April 15, Chicago Tribute. In a April...

No CommentsRead more »

On Controlling for Family Influence on Achievement

Posted on April 2, 2009

As I review Berends’ and colleagues 2008 volume Charter School Outcomes (Lawrence Erlbaum), a key assumption of Anglo-American political theory, namely that just inequality is the result of “natural distinction” (as opposed to social distinction), undergirds the authors’ efforts to improve research methods for evaluating school...

No CommentsRead more »