Posted on February 22, 2010
In corresponding with Cassiodorus about my book, the question of social change took center stage.
When you argue for social change you inevitably come up against the claims of “realism” — we can’t change this or that because to do so would be “unrealistic.” This is the argument typically favored by the incrementalists: “since we can’t change society as a whole,” they say, “let’s...
Read this article »
Posted on November 18, 2009
PRESS RELEASE: ‘Everyone Wins’ ignores factors besides competition to explain marginally improved public school achievement in NYC
November 17, 2009
Contact: Patrick McEwan, (781) 283-2987; (email) pmcewan@wellesley.edu
Gary Miron, (269) 599-7965; (email) gary.miron@wmich.edu
TEMPE, Ariz. and BOULDER, Colo. (November 17, 2009) — A report released three weeks ago looked at the competition effects of New York City’s charter schools,...
Read this article »
Posted on February 22, 2010
In a recent discussion of my book, A Measure of Failure, the typical argument against any critique of standardized testing was issued in response to a favorable review of the book’s main points. In the comments we read: “A math test, such as the math portion of the SAT for instance, most certainly measures a student’s ability to do the math...
Read this article »
Posted on February 24, 2010
The February issue of Counseling Today carries a review of my book by Aaron W. Hughey, professor of counseling and student affairs, Western Kentucky University.
The essay begins: “True or false: Proponents of standardized testing are, unintentionally or otherwise, pushing an agenda that intrinsically advocates racism and socioeconomic oppression. Intrigued? Then read on. It really is an understatement to claim that standardized testing permeates...
Read this article »